Supply chain verification
-
Third-party due diligence reports tracing a product or ingredient back through its supply chain, verifying origin, ownership, and licensing claims against independent data sources rather than self-reported paperwork
-
On-the-ground enquiry into overseas suppliers and sub-suppliers where public records run out
-
Flagging of common fraud patterns — mislabelled origin, substituted ingredients, unverifiable certification bodies
Supplier and labour hire integrity checks
-
Investigator-led verification of labour hire and contracting arrangements, going beyond a supplier's own compliance declarations
-
Site and workforce enquiries carried out under our private investigator licensing, where desktop checks can't confirm what's actually happening on the ground
-
Identification of red flags associated with underpayment, unsafe accommodation, and coercive work arrangements in subcontracted labour
Contract and policy review
-
Review of supplier and contractor agreements for the indemnity, audit rights, subcontracting, and termination clauses that determine whether a business can actually act if a problem is found
-
Gap analysis against Modern Slavery Act obligations and emerging mandatory due diligence requirements
-
Practical recommendations to close contractual blind spots before they become reputational or regulatory ones
Why this matters now?
Every business that relies on suppliers or subcontractors carries risk it can't see from a desk. That risk shows up in two places: in the supply chain itself where origin claims, certifications, and ingredient or component sourcing can be misrepresented long before goods reach the end customer and in the workforce behind it, where labour hire arrangements and subcontracting layers can obscure underpayment, unsafe conditions, or coercive work practices.
These aren't problems limited to one sector. They surface in food and agriculture, apparel and textiles, construction, mining and resources, cleaning and facilities services, hospitality, and manufacturing alike anywhere a company depends on suppliers or contracted labour it doesn't directly control. And the standard tools most businesses rely on a signed certification, a policy on file, a database check are exactly the kind of paperwork that can be gamed or simply never verified.
Regulatory settings are moving the same direction. Reform of the Modern Slavery Act is shifting from disclosure obligations toward mandatory due diligence, and scrutiny of import supply chains tied to forced labour risk is increasing. Reporting that something *might* be a risk is no longer enough companies are increasingly expected to show they've actually checked.
